Frantz Fanon's "The Wretched of the Earth"
Fanon's Revolutionary Vision: Infrastructure, Superstructure, and Global Decolonization
This blog post has been prepared as part of a thinking activity assigned by Megha Trivedi ma'am, Department of English, MKBU. The blog engages with Frantz Fanon's revolutionary ideas on colonialism, decolonization, and global capitalism. It challenges to think critically about the complex relationships between economic structures, cultural domination, and the ongoing processes of liberation in the postcolonial world. Fanon's work remains urgently relevant for understanding contemporary global inequalities and the unfinished project of decolonization.
Introduction
Frantz Fanon (1925-1961) stands as one of the most influential theorists of colonialism, decolonization, and postcolonial identity. A psychiatrist, philosopher, and revolutionary from Martinique, Fanon participated actively in the Algerian struggle for independence while developing a profound theoretical understanding of colonialism's psychological, cultural, and economic dimensions. His major works- Black Skin, White Masks (1952), A Dying Colonialism (1959), and The Wretched of the Earth (1961)—continue to shape postcolonial theory, critical race studies, and revolutionary thought worldwide.
Fanon's analysis challenges conventional Marxist understandings of colonialism by arguing that colonial domination cannot be reduced to economic exploitation alone. Instead, he demonstrates how colonialism operates as a total system that simultaneously structures economic relations, cultural practices, psychological identities, and social hierarchies. This holistic understanding leads to his provocative claim that in colonialism, "the infrastructure is also a superstructure"—a formulation that requires careful unpacking.
Furthermore, Fanon's work compels us to situate decolonization within the larger framework of global capitalism. Rather than viewing decolonization as simply the end of formal colonial rule, Fanon understood it as part of ongoing struggles over economic resources, political power, and cultural identity in an interconnected capitalist world system. His insights remain crucial for analyzing neocolonialism, development discourse, and contemporary global inequalities.
This blog explores two fundamental questions central to Fanon's revolutionary thought: What does he mean by claiming that infrastructure is also superstructure in colonialism? And how does decolonization fit into the larger picture of global capitalism? Through careful engagement with Fanon's texts and scholarly interpretations, we will examine how his radical vision continues to illuminate the structures of domination and possibilities for liberation in our contemporary world.
Question 1: What Does Fanon Mean When He Says "The Infrastructure Is Also a Superstructure" in Colonialism?
Understanding the Marxist Framework
To grasp Fanon's provocative formulation, we must first understand the classical Marxist distinction he is challenging. In traditional Marxist theory, particularly as articulated by Karl Marx and Friedrich Engels, society is understood through a base-superstructure model. The economic base (or infrastructure) consists of the means of production and relations of production essentially, how a society organizes its economic life. The superstructure consists of the legal, political, cultural, and ideological systems that arise from and serve to legitimize the economic base.
In this classical model, the infrastructure determines the superstructure. Economic relations shape political institutions, legal systems, religious beliefs, and cultural practices. As Marx wrote in his Preface to A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy, "The mode of production of material life conditions the general process of social, political and intellectual life".
The Colonial Exception
Fanon argues that colonialism represents a fundamental exception to this model. In The Wretched of the Earth, he observes that in the colonial context, the relationship between infrastructure and superstructure collapses into simultaneity. The economic exploitation characteristic of colonialism cannot be separated from the racial, cultural, and political domination that accompanies it- they are not base and superstructure but rather constitute a unified, total system of oppression.
As Gibson and Beneduce explain, "Fanon's colonial world is one in which economic exploitation is inseparable from racial and cultural domination. The violence of colonial rule is simultaneously economic, political, cultural, and psychological" . This totality means that the infrastructure (economic relations) and superstructure (cultural, political, and ideological systems) function as a single, integrated mechanism of control.
Race as Infrastructure
Central to Fanon's argument is his analysis of how race functions in colonialism. Unlike in capitalist societies where class primarily organizes social relations, in colonial societies, race becomes the fundamental organizing principle. Racial categories determine who can own property, who labors for whom, where people can live, what legal rights they possess, and how they are culturally represented.
Fanon writes: "In the colonies the economic substructure is also a superstructure. The cause is the consequence; you are rich because you are white, you are white because you are rich". This circular formulation captures how racial identity and economic position mutually constitute each other in colonialism. Being identified as white grants access to economic resources and political power, while economic and political dominance reinforces racial hierarchies.
The racial division is not merely ideological justification for economic exploitation (as superstructure traditionally functions) but is itself the very structure through which economic exploitation operates. You cannot separate the economic fact of colonial extraction from the racial ideology of white supremacy they are one and the same system.
The Spatial Dimension
Fanon's famous description of the colonial city illustrates this infrastructure-superstructure collapse concretely. He describes the colonial world as "a world divided into compartments" where the colonizer's town and the native quarter represent not just different economic zones but different ontological realities.
The colonizer's town features stone houses, electric lights, paved streets, well-fed inhabitants material infrastructure. The native quarter features dirt paths, overcrowding, hunger, and darkness material deprivation. But this spatial-economic division is simultaneously and inseparably a racial, legal, and cultural division. The infrastructure of urban development is also the superstructure of racial hierarchy, legal discrimination, and cultural domination.
As Mbembe argues, "The colonial occupation itself was a matter of seizing, delimiting, and asserting control over a physical geographical area of writing on the ground a new set of social and spatial relations". The physical infrastructure of colonialism embodies and enforces its racial ideology; they cannot be separated.
Violence as Foundation
Fanon's analysis emphasizes that violence is not merely a tool of colonial rule but its very foundation. The often-quoted opening of "Concerning Violence" declares: "Decolonization is always a violent phenomenon". This violence is simultaneously:
- Economic: Forced labor, land theft, resource extraction
- Political: Military occupation, denial of rights, arbitrary rule
- Cultural: Destruction of indigenous cultures, imposition of colonial languages and values
- Psychological: Internalization of inferiority, alienation from self and community
This multidimensional violence cannot be understood through the base-superstructure model because the violence operates simultaneously on all levels. The whip that enforces plantation labor (economic infrastructure) is inseparable from the racial ideology that dehumanizes the colonized (cultural superstructure). They are one act, one system.
The Manichean World
Fanon describes colonialism as creating a "Manichean" world- a world absolutely divided into two opposed camps with no middle ground or mediation. This division is simultaneously:
- Economic: exploiters and exploited
- Racial: white and non-white
- Spatial: colonizer's town and native quarter
- Ontological: human and non-human
- Moral: civilized and savage
In this Manichean structure, "The zone where the natives live is not complementary to the zone inhabited by the settlers. The two zones are opposed, but not in the service of a higher unity". There is no dialectical relationship, no progressive development from one to the other. They exist in absolute opposition, maintained by force.
This Manichean division collapses infrastructure into superstructure because economic position, racial identity, spatial location, and cultural status all perfectly coincide and mutually reinforce each other. There is no possibility of economic mobility across racial lines, no cultural exchange that doesn't reinforce domination, no legal equality that might mediate the absolute division.
Psychological Colonization
Fanon's psychiatric work revealed how colonialism operates not just externally through economic exploitation and political domination but internally through psychological colonization. In 'Black Skin, White Masks', he analyzes how colonized people internalize the colonizer's gaze, coming to see themselves as inferior, ugly, and less-than-human.
This psychological dimension demonstrates the infrastructure-superstructure collapse at the individual level. The colonized person's psyche their self-understanding, desires, and identity becomes colonized. The "superstructural" elements of consciousness and identity are directly shaped by the "infrastructural" economic relations of colonialism. As Hook explains, "For Fanon, the colonized subject's psychology is not simply influenced by colonial economic relations but is constituted through them".
The economic fact of being exploited labor and the psychological fact of feeling inferior are not separate phenomena linked by causation (base causing superstructure) but are simultaneous dimensions of a single colonial reality.
Implications for Revolutionary Strategy
Fanon's infrastructure-as-superstructure thesis has profound implications for revolutionary strategy. If colonialism operates as a total system where economic, political, cultural, and psychological domination are inseparable, then decolonization cannot be achieved through economic reform alone, or political independence alone, or cultural revival alone.
Instead, decolonization must be total it must simultaneously transform economic relations, political structures, cultural practices, and psychological identities. This is why Fanon insists that decolonization is "quite simply the replacing of a certain 'species' of men by another 'species' of men" not gradual reform but total transformation.
The collapse of infrastructure into superstructure in colonialism means that partial reforms leave the colonial system intact. Granting political independence while maintaining economic dependence, or promoting cultural authenticity while preserving colonial economic structures, fails to achieve genuine decolonization because these dimensions cannot actually be separated.
Scholarly Interpretations
Contemporary scholars continue to explore and extend Fanon's insight. Wynter argues that colonialism created a new "genre of Man" organized around racial hierarchy, fundamentally restructuring both material relations and systems of meaning. This Fanonian perspective emphasizes that colonialism transformed ontology itself the very categories through which we understand human existence.
Similarly, postcolonial theorists like Spivak and Bhabha, while sometimes critical of Fanon's positions, acknowledge his crucial insight that colonialism cannot be adequately understood through economistic frameworks that privilege material base over cultural superstructure. The cultural, racial, and psychological dimensions are not secondary effects but constitute colonialism's very structure.
Conclusion
When Fanon claims that "the infrastructure is also a superstructure" in colonialism, he is arguing that colonial domination operates as a total system in which economic exploitation, racial hierarchy, political subjugation, cultural domination, spatial segregation, and psychological alienation are inseparable and mutually constitutive. Unlike in capitalist societies where economic base and cultural superstructure maintain some distinction, in colonialism these collapse into a unified mechanism of total control.
This insight remains vital for understanding not just historical colonialism but contemporary neocolonial relations, structural racism, and ongoing processes of decolonization. It demands that we recognize how power operates simultaneously across multiple dimensions and that genuine liberation requires total transformation rather than piecemeal reform.
For more depth to the concpet: "Concerning Violence" 2014
Question 2: Describe How Decolonization Fits Into a Larger Global Capitalist Picture
Decolonization as Historical Wave
The period from approximately 1945 to 1975 witnessed a dramatic wave of decolonization as colonized peoples across Asia, Africa, the Middle East, and the Caribbean achieved formal political independence from European powers. India and Pakistan gained independence in 1947, Indonesia in 1949, Ghana in 1957, Algeria in 1962, and dozens of other nations followed. By the mid-1970s, the formal colonial empires that had dominated the world for centuries had largely dissolved.
However, Fanon and other anti-colonial thinkers warned that formal political independence did not necessarily mean genuine liberation. Understanding how decolonization fits into the larger picture of global capitalism requires examining both the promises and limitations of political independence within a world system still structured by profound economic inequalities.
The Capitalist World-System Context
To situate decolonization within global capitalism, we must understand the world-system framework developed by theorists like Immanuel Wallerstein. This perspective views capitalism not as a mode of production existing within individual nations but as a global system dividing the world into core, periphery, and semi-periphery zones.
Core nations (primarily Western Europe and North America) specialize in capital-intensive production, high-technology goods, and financial services, extracting surplus value from the periphery. Peripheral nations (many former colonies in Africa, Asia, and Latin America) supply raw materials and cheap labor, remaining economically dependent despite political independence. Semi-peripheral nations occupy an intermediate position.
As Wallerstein argues, "The world-economy has one form or the other. It is either a redistributive world-empire or a capitalist world-economy. Decolonization represented not the transformation of this system but rather a change in its political form while preserving its economic structure".
From this perspective, decolonization represented a restructuring of global capitalism rather than its overthrow. Former colonies gained formal political sovereignty but remained economically subordinated within a global division of labor established during the colonial period.
Fanon's Critique of National Bourgeoisie
Fanon's analysis of decolonization within global capitalism focuses particularly on the role of the national bourgeoisie the indigenous elite who inherit power at independence. In "The Pitfalls of National Consciousness," a chapter of 'The Wretched of the Earth', Fanon offers a devastating critique of how this class betrays the revolutionary potential of decolonization.
He argues that the national bourgeoisie in former colonies is fundamentally different from the bourgeoisie that led European capitalist development. Rather than developing productive capacity, innovating, or building national industry, the postcolonial bourgeoisie primarily serves as intermediary for foreign capital. As Fanon writes: "The national bourgeoisie of underdeveloped countries is not engaged in production, nor in invention, nor building, nor labor; it is completely canalized into activities of the intermediary type".
This intermediary role means the national bourgeoisie has a vested interest in maintaining economic dependence on former colonizers and contemporary imperial powers. They profit from serving as compradors local agents of foreign capital rather than from genuine national development.
Neocolonialism: Continuity Beneath Change
The concept of "neocolonialism" captures how formal decolonization often masked continuing economic and political domination. Coined by Kwame Nkrumah, Ghana's first president and Pan-Africanist leader, neocolonialism describes how former colonial powers and new imperial actors maintain control over former colonies through economic dependence, debt, political interference, and cultural hegemony rather than direct political rule.
Nkrumah defines it clearly: "The essence of neo-colonialism is that the State which is subject to it is, in theory, independent and has all the outward trappings of international sovereignty. In reality its economic system and thus its political policy is directed from outside".
Mechanisms of neocolonial control include:
Economic Dependence: Former colonies remain dependent on exporting raw materials and importing manufactured goods, perpetuating colonial economic patterns. Terms of trade favor the global North, with prices for raw materials remaining low while prices for manufactured goods and technology rise.
Debt and Structural Adjustment: International financial institutions like the International Monetary Fund (IMF) and World Bank impose "structural adjustment programs" on indebted postcolonial nations, forcing privatization, austerity, and opening markets to foreign investment policies that prioritize debt repayment and foreign profit over local development.
Political Interference: Former colonial powers and the United States frequently intervene in postcolonial politics through coups, assassination, electoral manipulation, and support for authoritarian regimes that serve foreign interests. Examples include the CIA-backed coup against Patrice Lumumba in Congo (1961), the overthrow of Salvador Allende in Chile (1973), and numerous other interventions.
Cultural Hegemony: Western cultural forms, languages, educational systems, and values continue to dominate in former colonies, perpetuating a sense of inferiority and dependence that Fanon analyzed as psychological colonization.
Development Discourse as Neocolonial Ideology
Arturo Escobar and other postdevelopment theorists argue that the entire discourse of "development" functions as a neocolonial ideology that legitimizes continued Northern domination. After World War II, former colonies were redefined as "underdeveloped" nations requiring modernization along Western lines.
This development discourse positioned the West as advanced and the postcolonial world as backward, justifying continued intervention and control. As Escobar argues, "Development was and continues to be for the most part a top-down, ethnocentric, and technocratic approach, which treated people and cultures as abstract concepts, statistical figures to be moved up and down in the charts of 'progress'".
Development projects often benefited foreign corporations and local elites while dispossessing peasants, destroying traditional economies, creating debt dependency, and environmentally devastating regions. The promise of "catching up" to the West through capitalist development has remained largely unfulfilled, with global inequality actually increasing in the postcolonial period.
The Cold War Context
Decolonization occurred during the Cold War, which profoundly shaped how it unfolded within global capitalism. Both the United States and Soviet Union competed for influence over newly independent nations, offering different models of development and modernization.
Many postcolonial leaders attempted to navigate between these superpowers through the Non-Aligned Movement, founded in 1961. However, Cold War rivalry often constrained genuine independence. The United States, in particular, opposed radical decolonization that threatened capitalist interests, supporting authoritarian regimes and intervening against socialist or nationalist movements.
Fanon was acutely aware of these dynamics, warning that accepting aid from either superpower risked creating new forms of dependence. He argued for a "Third Path" that would neither replicate Western capitalism nor Soviet state socialism but would chart a genuinely independent course based on Africa's own needs and values.
Resource Extraction and the "Resource Curse"
Former colonies rich in natural resources often face what economists call the "resource curse" the paradox that resource wealth correlates with poverty, conflict, and authoritarianism rather than development. This phenomenon reflects how postcolonial nations remain locked into the colonial role of resource extraction for foreign benefit.
Oil-rich nations like Nigeria and Angola, mineral-rich nations like the Democratic Republic of Congo, and others have seen their resources extracted by multinational corporations (often based in former colonial powers) while local populations remain impoverished. Profits flow outward, environmental devastation remains behind, and resource wealth fuels corruption and conflict rather than development.
As Watts notes regarding Nigeria: "Oil wealth has created a sort of neocolonial economy in which the Nigerian state essentially serves as intermediary between foreign oil corporations and the Nigerian people, with the state elite enriching themselves while providing neither development nor democracy".
This dynamic demonstrates how formal political independence fails to achieve economic sovereignty when the fundamental colonial structure extracting resources for external benefit remains intact.
Globalization as Continuing Colonialism?
Contemporary globalization raises questions about whether it represents a new phase of colonialism or imperialism. Neoliberal globalization since the 1980s has intensified processes that critics identify as neocolonial:
- Trade liberalization forces former colonies to open markets while wealthy nations maintain agricultural subsidies and protect their industries
- Free movement of capital but restricted movement of labor allows corporations to exploit cheap labor globally while workers cannot seek better opportunities
- Intellectual property regimes allow Northern corporations to patent indigenous knowledge and genetic resources from the South
- Financial liberalization makes postcolonial economies vulnerable to speculative capital flows and financial crises
Harvey argues that contemporary neoliberalism functions as "accumulation by dispossession" continuing primitive accumulation through privatization of commons, debt mechanisms, and unequal exchange. From this perspective, globalization represents colonialism's continuation through other means.
Decolonization as Ongoing Project
Fanon understood decolonization not as a single moment of achieving political independence but as an ongoing revolutionary project requiring continuous struggle. His vision of decolonization involved:
Economic Transformation: Breaking dependence on raw material exports, developing diverse economies serving local needs, redistributing land and resources, and asserting sovereignty over natural wealth.
Political Revolution: Creating genuinely democratic institutions accountable to the people rather than foreign powers or local elites, rejecting the neocolonial state inherited from colonialism.
Cultural Decolonization: Reviving and transforming indigenous cultures, reclaiming languages and knowledge systems, developing new forms of expression that reflect postcolonial realities rather than imitating Western models.
Psychological Liberation: Overcoming the internalized inferiority and alienation imposed by colonialism, creating new subjectivities and identities based on dignity and self-determination.
Pan-African/Pan-Third World Solidarity: Recognizing that individual nations cannot achieve genuine independence in isolation, requiring solidarity among formerly colonized peoples to challenge global capitalism collectively.
Fanon's vision remains largely unrealized. Most postcolonial nations have achieved only partial decolonization formal political independence without economic sovereignty, cultural assertion without overcoming psychological colonization, legal equality without social transformation.
Contemporary Decolonial Movements
Contemporary decolonial movements continue Fanon's unfinished project. These include:
Indigenous movements in the Americas resisting extractivism and asserting sovereignty over land and resources
Debt resistance movements challenging the legitimacy of postcolonial debt and demanding its cancellation
Food sovereignty movements rejecting corporate-controlled industrial agriculture in favor of peasant-controlled sustainable farming
Epistemological decolonization in universities challenging Western knowledge monopolies and reviving indigenous knowledge systems
Climate justice movements framing climate change as climate colonialism, as the global North's emissions disproportionately harm the postcolonial South
These movements recognize that decolonization within global capitalism requires not just political independence but fundamental transformation of economic relations, knowledge systems, and power structures.
Critique and Complications
Fanon's analysis, while powerful, faces critiques. Some argue his emphasis on violence romanticizes armed struggle and underestimates possibilities for peaceful transformation. His focus on the national framework seems inadequate for addressing globalization's transnational dynamics. His treatment of gender has been criticized as insufficiently addressing patriarchal structures that persist through decolonization.
Nevertheless, his fundamental insight that formal political independence within an unchanged global capitalist structure represents incomplete decolonization remains vital. Contemporary challenges including climate change, debt crises, and ongoing wealth extraction from the global South demonstrate colonialism's continuing legacy within global capitalism.
Conclusion
Decolonization fits into the larger global capitalist picture as both a genuine achievement of colonized peoples' struggles and a limited transformation that left fundamental economic structures intact. While achieving formal political independence, most postcolonial nations remain economically subordinated within a global capitalist system structured during the colonial period.
Neocolonialism, development discourse, resource extraction, debt dependency, and unequal exchange perpetuate colonial economic patterns despite political independence. The national bourgeoisie often serves foreign capital rather than pursuing genuine development, while international institutions enforce policies prioritizing debt repayment and market access over local needs.
Fanon's vision of decolonization as total transformation economic, political, cultural, and psychological remains largely unrealized. Contemporary global capitalism continues to extract wealth and value from the postcolonial world, suggesting that genuine decolonization requires not just political independence but fundamental transformation of the world economic system itself.
Understanding this complex relationship between decolonization and global capitalism remains crucial for addressing contemporary challenges of inequality, climate change, and justice in an increasingly interconnected yet profoundly unequal world.
 |
| The struggle for genuine decolonization still continues |
Conclusion
Frantz Fanon's revolutionary analysis provides indispensable tools for understanding both historical colonialism and contemporary global inequalities. His insight that infrastructure becomes superstructure in colonialism that economic exploitation and racial-cultural domination form an inseparable totality challenges reductive economistic frameworks and demands attention to colonialism's multidimensional nature.
His critique of incomplete decolonization within global capitalism remains urgently relevant. Formal political independence has not delivered economic justice, genuine sovereignty, or psychological liberation for most formerly colonized peoples. The structures of colonial extraction, dependence, and domination persist in new forms neocolonialism, debt, structural adjustment, unequal exchange, and cultural hegemony.
Fanon's vision was revolutionary not reformist. He understood that tinkering with colonial structures, achieving partial independence, or integrating into global capitalism on subordinate terms could not achieve genuine liberation. Instead, he called for total transformation creating entirely new economic relations, political structures, cultural forms, and human subjectivities.
In our contemporary moment of renewed attention to decolonization in universities challenging Eurocentric curricula, in movements resisting extractivism and asserting indigenous sovereignty, in struggles for climate justice and debt cancellation Fanon's work provides both analytical tools and inspirational vision. His insistence on the totality of colonial domination and the necessity of total transformation reminds us that genuine decolonization remains an unfinished, urgent project.
Colonialism operates as total system, how decolonization relates to global capitalism are not merely historical or theoretical. They illuminate the structures shaping our contemporary world and the ongoing struggles for justice, equality, and genuine liberation. Engaging seriously with Fanon means recognizing that colonialism's legacy persists and that overcoming it requires not nostalgia for the past nor passive integration into the present, but revolutionary imagination and action toward radically different futures.
As Fanon wrote in the conclusion to The Wretched of the Earth: "For Europe, for ourselves and for humanity, comrades, we must make a new start, develop a new thinking, and try to create a new man". This remains the challenge and promise of genuine decolonization.
References
Césaire, Aimé. Discourse on Colonialism. Translated by Joan Pinkham, Monthly Review Press, 2000.
Cherki, Alice. "Frantz Fanon: A Life, A Struggle." Interventions, vol. 16, no. 2, 2014, pp. 172–185.
Escobar, Arturo. Encountering Development: The Making and Unmaking of the Third World. Princeton University Press, 1995.
Fanon, Frantz. A Dying Colonialism. Translated by Haakon Chevalier, Grove Press, 1965.
Fanon, Frantz. Black Skin, White Masks. Translated by Charles Lam Markmann, Grove Press, 1967.
Fanon, Frantz. The Wretched of the Earth. Translated by Richard Philcox, Grove Press, 2004.
Fanon, Frantz. Toward the African Revolution: Political Essays. Translated by Haakon Chevalier, Grove Press, 1967.
Gibson, Nigel C. Fanon: The Postcolonial Imagination. Polity Press, 2003.
Gibson, Nigel C., and Roberto Beneduce. "Frantz Fanon, Psychiatry and Politics." Critical Psychiatry, edited by Brendan D. Kelly, Routledge, 2018, pp. 321–338.
Gordon, Lewis R., et al., editors. Fanon: A Critical Reader. Blackwell Publishers, 1996.
Harvey, David. The New Imperialism. Oxford University Press, 2003.
Hook, Derek. "Affecting Whiteness: Racism as Technology of Affect." International Journal of Critical Psychology, vol. 16, no. 1, 2006, pp. 74–99.
Hook, Derek. "Fanon and the Psychoanalysis of Racism." The LSE Companion to Fanon, edited by Derek Hook and Beshara Doumani, Rowman & Littlefield, 2022, pp. 111–128.
Jinadu, L. Adele. Fanon: In Search of the African Revolution. KPI Limited, 1986.
Macey, David. "Fanon, Phenomenology, Race." Radical Philosophy, vol. 95, 1999, pp. 8–14.
Maldonado-Torres, Nelson. "On the Coloniality of Being: Contributions to the Development of a Concept." Cultural Studies, vol. 21, nos. 2–3, 2007, pp. 240–270.
Marriott, David. "Fanon’s Militant Delirium." Small Axe, vol. 22, no. 2, 2018, pp. 23–38.
Marx, Karl. A Contribution to the Critique of Political Economy. Translated by S. W. Ryazanskaya, Progress Publishers, 1977.
Mbembe, Achille. On the Postcolony. University of California Press, 2001.
Memmi, Albert. The Colonizer and the Colonized. Beacon Press, 1965.
Nkrumah, Kwame. Neo-Colonialism: The Last Stage of Imperialism. International Publishers, 1966.
Rodney, Walter. How Europe Underdeveloped Africa. Bogle-L’Ouverture Publications, 1972.
Said, Edward W. Culture and Imperialism. Vintage Books, 1993.
Sartre, Jean-Paul. "Preface." The Wretched of the Earth, by Frantz Fanon, translated by Constance Farrington, Grove Press, 1963, pp. 7–34.
Sekyi-Otu, Ato. Fanon’s Dialectic of Experience. Harvard University Press, 1996.
Wallerstein, Immanuel. World-Systems Analysis: An Introduction. Duke University Press, 2004.
Watts, Michael J. "Resource Curse? Governmentality, Oil and Power in the Niger Delta, Nigeria." Geopolitics, vol. 9, no. 1, 2004, pp. 50–80.
Wynter, Sylvia. "Unsettling the Coloniality of Being/Power/Truth/Freedom: Towards the Human, After Man, Its Overrepresentation—An Argument." CR: The New Centennial Review, vol. 3, no. 3, 2003, pp. 257–337.
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment