Indian English Poems: Before Independence
Analysis of Toru Dutt's "Lakshman"
Introduction
Toru Dutt (1856-1877) stands as a pioneering figure in Indian English literature, creating a unique synthesis of Indian mythological traditions and Victorian literary techniques. Her poem "Lakshman" from Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan (1882) reimagines a crucial episode from Valmiki's Ramayana the moment when Sita compels Lakshman to abandon his protective duty, leading to her abduction by Ravana. This analysis examines how Dutt's portrayal departs from traditional ideals and illuminates complex gender dynamics.
Toru Dutt: Pioneer of Indian English Poetry:
Question 1: Do you think the character of Sita portrayed by Toru Dutt in her poem Lakshman differs from the ideal image of Sita presented in The Ramayana? (Sita's Characterization - A Departure from the Ramayana Ideal)
The Traditional Ideal of Sita
In Valmiki's Ramayana, Sita embodies the pativrata ideal the perfect devoted wife. She demonstrates unwavering devotion to Rama, stoic acceptance of suffering, emotional control, modest silence, and deference to male authority. The classical Sita functions primarily as an object of male action rather than an active subject. She endures exile, abduction, rescue, testing by fire, and eventual banishment with dignified patience, never questioning dharmic authority or displaying emotional volatility. Her virtue lies in passive endurance and absolute submission to righteous duty.
The Ramayana: Understanding Sita's Character:
Dutt's Radical Reinterpretation
Dutt's Sita differs fundamentally from this traditional ideal through several key transformations:
Emotional Volatility and Psychological Authenticity: Unlike the composed classical Sita, Dutt presents a character consumed by anxiety and fear. From the poem's opening, Sita displays intense emotional distress upon hearing what she believes is Rama's cry for help. Her desperation escalates throughout the dialogue, revealing genuine human psychology rather than superhuman composure. This emotional authenticity reflects Victorian literary values emphasizing psychological realism.
Challenging Male Authority: Most shockingly, Dutt's Sita directly challenges Lakshman's judgment and attacks his character. When Lakshman patiently explains that the cry must be demonic trickery, Sita refuses to accept his reasoning. She accuses him of either cowardice or harboring secret desires for Rama's death so he can possess her. Such accusations would be unthinkable for the traditional Sita, who treats Lakshman with sisterly respect and never questions male authority.
Active Agency: Dutt's Sita exercises decision-making power that shapes the narrative. By compelling Lakshman to leave through emotional manipulation and harsh accusations, she demonstrates autonomy rather than passive acceptance. While this agency proves catastrophic enabling her abduction it nevertheless grants Sita subjecthood and the capacity to influence events rather than merely enduring them.
Victorian Literary Influences
Dutt's transformation of Sita reflects her education in Victorian literary traditions. The dramatic monologue technique of Browning and Tennyson emphasized psychological complexity over moral idealization. Victorian realism valued characters who displayed recognizable human emotions and motivations rather than embodying abstract virtues. Dutt applies these techniques to Indian mythological material, creating a hybrid form that honors traditional narratives while introducing psychological depth.
Victorian Poetry and Psychological Realism: Browning's Dramatic Monologues:
Scholarly Perspective: As Sisir Kumar Das observes, Dutt "brings to Indian mythological characters a psychological depth influenced by her reading of Victorian poetry, particularly Tennyson's dramatic monologues" (History of Indian Literature 178). This synthesis creates something genuinely new- neither simply Indian nor simply British but a distinctive hybrid literature.
Question 2: Can it be said that the dialogues between Sita and Lakshman in the poem Lakshman through light upon the perspective of gender? Explain. (Gender Perspectives in the Sita-Lakshman Dialogue)
Gendered Spatial Dynamics
The poem's setting establishes crucial power dynamics through spatial arrangements:
Sita's Confinement: The hermitage functions as both protection and prison. Sita cannot venture into the forest, cannot verify Rama's safety, and cannot act independently. This spatial confinement creates epistemic disadvantage she must depend entirely on Lakshman's interpretation of events beyond her perception.
Lakshman's Threshold Position: Standing guard between interior and exterior, Lakshman possesses mobility, visual access, and interpretive authority that Sita lacks. He controls information flow and determines appropriate responses to threats.
Rama's Masculine Exterior: Hunting in the forest represents the active masculine public sphere where significant events occur. Sita's exclusion from this space limits her direct knowledge and renders her dependent on male mediation.
This spatial arrangement reflects broader patriarchal patterns where women's confinement to domestic spaces produces epistemic inequality, justifying male authority to interpret reality and make decisions.
Gender and Space in Classical Indian Literature:
Gendered Communication Patterns
Sita's Emotional Communication: Characterized by urgency, personal appeals, and escalating desperation. When rational arguments fail, she resorts to harsh accusations attacking Lakshman's honor suggesting cowardice or base motives. This emotional communication reflects strategies available to those lacking direct authority. Women must persuade, manipulate, or guilt men into compliance because they cannot command.
Lakshman's Rational Communication: Emphasizes logic, duty, and hierarchical propriety. He appeals to dharma, Rama's command, and rational assessment. His calm authority contrasts with Sita's emotional intensity, apparently confirming gender stereotypes associating masculinity with reason and femininity with emotion.
However, Dutt complicates this binary: Lakshman's rationality ultimately proves inadequate his judgment, while logically sound, leads to catastrophe. His masculine honor proves vulnerable to Sita's accusations, forcing him to abandon reason and respond to emotional challenge.
The Double Bind of Feminine Virtue
Sita faces impossible contradictory expectations:
Wifely Devotion Paradox: Should she trust in Rama's invincibility and accept Lakshman's judgment (showing proper faith and deference), or should she act urgently to protect Rama (showing appropriate wifely concern)? Both aspects of ideal devotion pull in opposite directions.
Speech/Silence Dilemma: Remaining silent accepts male authority but potentially neglects family welfare. Speaking, especially harshly, violates feminine propriety but achieves necessary goals. Either choice invites criticism.
Agency/Passivity Trap: Acting independently asserts agency but violates feminine passivity norms and leads to catastrophic consequences. Remaining passive would also have been problematic had Rama actually faced danger.
These contradictions reveal how patriarchal systems create structural impossibilities for women, ensuring they can always be found wanting regardless of choices. As Susie Tharu and K. Lalita observe, Dutt's retellings "interrogate the moral frameworks that construct idealized femininity as necessarily requiring self-abnegation and silence" (Women Writing in India 234).
"The Double Bind: Gender Paradoxes in Patriarchal Literature"-
Masculine Constraints
The dialogue also reveals masculine gender burdens:
Honor Vulnerability: Lakshman's masculine identity depends on reputation for courage and loyalty. Sita's accusations attack this core identity, compelling him to prove himself through action despite better judgment. Masculine honor proves vulnerable to discursive attack.
Decision-Making Burden: Expected to make correct decisions with inadequate information, Lakshman bears responsibility for catastrophic outcomes even when facing impossible choices between conflicting duties.
Emotional Restraint Costs: Required to maintain rational composure, Lakshman cannot express doubt or vulnerability, potentially making wrong decisions more likely by preventing serious consideration of alternative perspectives.
While these constraints differ from women's subordination men retain structural power advantages they reveal how rigid gender roles harm everyone.
Colonial Context and Cultural Hybridity
Dutt's bicultural education Bengali and Sanskrit learning combined with English and French education in Europe positioned her uniquely to create genuinely hybrid literature. Her work negotiates between colonial power dynamics, Indian cultural pride, Victorian literary sophistication, and proto-feminist consciousness. She neither simply accepts British claims of cultural superiority nor uncritically defends all traditional Indian practices. Instead, she uses each tradition to interrogate the other, revealing patriarchal constraints operating across cultural boundaries.
Conclusion
Toru Dutt's "Lakshman" represents a sophisticated literary achievement that transforms traditional mythological material through Victorian psychological realism. Her Sita departs radically from the classical ideal, displaying emotional volatility, active agency, and willingness to challenge male authority. This humanization grants Sita psychological complexity and dignity as a subject rather than reducing her to an idealized symbol.
The Sita-Lakshman dialogue powerfully illuminates gender dynamics that transcend cultural boundaries. It reveals how spatial arrangements create epistemic inequality, how communication patterns reflect power asymmetries, how contradictory expectations trap women in impossible double binds, and how masculine identity itself is constructed through vulnerable honor codes. Neither character emerges as simply virtuous or flawed; both are trapped by gendered constraints that make tragedy virtually inevitable.
Dutt's proto-feminist intervention operates through visibility and humanization rather than explicit political critique. By making gendered constraints visible through psychologically authentic characterization, she invites critical reflection on whether systems creating such impossibilities can be just. Her synthesis of Indian and Victorian traditions creates genuinely hybrid literature that questions both patriarchal frameworks while committing fully to neither cultural tradition.
This achievement remains relevant for contemporary discussions of gender justice, demonstrating how literary analysis can illuminate structural patterns of power and constraint that persist across historical periods and cultural contexts.
Works Cited
Chakravarty, Radha. Feminism and Contemporary Women Writers: Rethinking Subjectivity. Routledge, 2008.
Das, Sisir Kumar. A History of Indian Literature, 1800-1910: Western Impact, Indian Response. Sahitya Akademi, 1991.
Dutt, Toru. Ancient Ballads and Legends of Hindustan. Kegan Paul, Trench & Co., 1882.
Iyengar, K. R. Srinivasa. Indian Writing in English. 5th ed., Sterling Publishers, 1985.
Richman, Paula, editor. Many Ramayanas: The Diversity of a Narrative Tradition in South Asia. University of California Press, 1991.
Tharu, Susie, and K. Lalita, editors. Women Writing in India: 600 B.C. to the Present, Vol. I. The Feminist Press at CUNY, 1991.
Valmiki. The Ramayana. Translated by Arshia Sattar, Penguin Books, 1996.
.jpg)
Comments
Post a Comment